Stay Updated with Essential Utilities News and Alerts

Subscribe to receive a myFT Daily Digest email that compiles the latest Utilities updates and information every morning, ensuring you stay informed.

Water companies across England and Wales are proposing significant increases in household bills, aimed at funding a historic £96 billion investment in the water and sewage infrastructure. This ambitious plan reflects the urgent need to modernize and maintain these critical systems, which serve millions of residents and businesses. The proposed adjustments are set to be submitted to the regulatory authority, Ofwat, on Monday and could lead to average bills rising by £156 annually per household by the end of the decade. This plan spans from 2025 to 2030 and indicates a near doubling of the previous five-year investment of £51 billion.

As natural monopolies, water companies operate under the regulatory oversight of Ofwat, which determines the allowable charges for maintenance and upgrades to essential infrastructure over five-year regulatory cycles. However, this year’s discussions are particularly contentious, marking the most complex negotiations since the sector’s privatization 34 years ago. Ofwat faces the challenging task of balancing demands for substantial investment with growing public dissatisfaction regarding sewage discharges and the rising costs faced by consumers during a cost of living crisis.

Additionally, Ofwat must reassure investors in water companies that the regulatory framework provides enough stability to encourage ongoing investment. Many companies are currently grappling with highly leveraged balance sheets and are seeking new equity from investors to sustain their operations. This financial pressure adds an extra layer of complexity as regulatory bodies aim to ensure both sustainable infrastructure improvements and investor confidence.

David Henderson, the chief executive of Water UK, the industry’s representative body, emphasized the importance of accepting these proposals, stating, “While rising bills are never welcomed, endorsing these plans is crucial. This will enable us to provide top-quality drinking water for our growing population, secure our water supply for the future, and minimize the use of storm overflows.”

The proposed investments include £11 billion dedicated to reducing overflow spills, improving the transfer of water from the wetter north to the drier south, and constructing ten new storage tanks—none of which have been built in the last three years. Ofwat has a year to review and finalize these plans, ensuring they align with both public needs and investment requirements.

Currently, the average household bill stands at £448, though this figure varies significantly by region and is adjusted annually for inflation. For example, Severn Trent, which serves the Midlands and Wales, has already announced plans to increase bills by 38 percent, equating to approximately £139 per household by 2030. Other firms, such as Southern Water, which faced backlash for discharging untreated sewage and stormwater near popular beaches last summer, are expected to propose even steeper increases on Monday.

David Black, the chief executive of Ofwat, is working to mitigate potential customer backlash by assuring households that they will “only pay for future investments, not to rectify past mistakes.” This statement is crucial in maintaining consumer trust as families face soaring household expenses. He added, “As families struggle with rising costs, it’s vital that the necessary performance improvements and investments deliver genuine value for money.”

Black further asserted that Ofwat will hold companies accountable by promoting better service delivery and implementing penalties for those that fail to meet regulatory standards. This accountability is essential for ensuring that consumers receive reliable and high-quality water services.

Thérèse Coffey, the Environment Secretary, reiterated the government’s commitment to consumer protection, stating, “I have made it clear to Ofwat that customers should not bear the costs of inadequate performance, and I expect them to utilize all the powers granted to them on behalf of consumers.”

However, there are mounting concerns that the regulatory body and the government’s strong emphasis on accountability and significant penalties could deter investors. Water companies are currently burdened with £60 billion in debt, a stark contrast to their zero debt status at the time of privatization. Despite infrequent equity injections since privatization, many companies are now approaching investors for capital.

Dominic Nash, an analyst at Barclays Research, cautioned that “Investment in the water sector should not be taken for granted. We believe that recent announcements from Ofwat and Defra have heightened risks for investors, potentially leading to decreased investment in the sector rather than an increase.”

In 2020, four water companies had their appeals upheld by the Competition and Markets Authority after Ofwat rejected parts of their initial proposals. The regulator had concerns that these companies could achieve their investment goals more cost-effectively, which, under the stringent regulatory system, allows them to redirect some excess profits to investors, including a mix of private equity, pension, and sovereign wealth funds. Many industry experts anticipate a repeat of the appeals process next year.

Feargal Sharkey, a prominent advocate for water issues, questioned, “What has happened to our money? Where has it gone? If the funds had been allocated to address sewage issues and build reservoirs, they wouldn’t be requesting such substantial increases now.” This highlights the ongoing concerns regarding transparency and accountability in the management of water resources and infrastructure.