Delaware Chancery Choose Kathaleen St. J. McCormick mentioned if the transaction isn’t carried out by that point, she’s going to set trial dates in November, in line with an order issued Thursday. 

The ruling is a win for Musk, who requested the choose to pause Twitter’s lawsuit towards him, saying the social media firm “is not going to take sure for a solution” after he revived his bid to purchase it. The billionaire earlier this week proposed consummating the $54.20-per-share deal offered the court docket “enter a direct keep of the motion” and “adjourn the trial and all different proceedings,” in line with a letter dated Oct. 3. In Musk’s Thursday submitting, the billionaire’s attorneys mentioned they’re now aiming for an Oct. 28 deadline. 

Twitter objected to his request to pause, saying the billionaire “can and may” shut the deal subsequent week.

Talks between the 2 sides have been caught after Musk mentioned that his supply is now contingent on receiving $13 billion in debt financing. The unique deal, which he initially proposed in April after which reneged on, didn’t include such a contingency. Musk mentioned Twitter is resisting halting court docket proceedings primarily based on the “theoretical risk of a future failure to acquire the debt financing.” 

“The impediment to terminating this litigation is just not, as defendants say, that Twitter is unwilling to take sure for a solution,” Twitter attorneys mentioned in a court docket submitting responding to Musk’s request to place the case on maintain. “The impediment is that Defendants nonetheless refuse to just accept their contractual obligations.”

Musk’s attorneys had mentioned that “Twitter can’t present any prejudice from a short keep of this motion to permit the events to deal with closing,” in line with the sooner submitting. “Within the occasion a closing doesn’t happen, the litigation can promptly resume primarily based on the then present information and no matter points stay on the time.”

Going forward with a trial, and the appeals that will comply with, would trigger the deal to take “months” to finish, Musk’s attorneys mentioned. They requested for a direct listening to on the movement, in line with a letter to the choose.

Twitter mentioned it’s doubtful of Musk’s guarantees, and mentioned {that a} banker concerned within the debt financing testified earlier Thursday that Musk had but to ship them a borrowing discover, and had in any other case not communicated to them that he supposed to shut the deal. The banker additionally mentioned that “the principle activity mandatory to shut the deal—memorializing the debt financing—may have occurred in July however didn’t as a result of Mr. Musk presupposed to terminate the deal.”

“Now, on the eve of trial, defendants declare they intend to shut in any case,” Twitter mentioned in its submitting. “‘Belief us,’ they are saying, ‘we imply it this time,’ and they also ask to be relieved from a depending on the deserves.”

Musk’s proposed keep “is an invite to additional mischief and delay,” the platform added. “Till Defendants commit to shut as required, Twitter is entitled to its day in Courtroom.”

The 2 events had been gearing up for the week-long courtroom battle on Oct. 17, which might have decided whether or not the billionaire had legit grounds to torpedo the buyout due to alleged faux consumer accounts. McCormick dominated towards the Tesla Inc. CEO on a few half-dozen pre-trial points that would have foreshadowed difficulties in making his case in court docket. 

Seven banks, led by Morgan Stanley, totally underwrote the debt portion of the financing, in line with an April submitting. As is common in this sort of contract, banks initially deliberate to promote most of that debt to institutional cash managers earlier than the Twitter deal closed, however they’ve at all times been on the hook for offering the funding if something went fallacious.

There are only a few, if any, methods for banks to get out of offering such debt commitments after signing the contract. And most banks wouldn’t wish to, even when it meant stopping a loss, as a result of backing out would replicate poorly on their funding banking enterprise and will hurt their capacity to win new offers with corporations and personal fairness companies sooner or later.

A consultant for Morgan Stanley declined to remark concerning the Musk deal.

Bloomberg reported earlier that, as a part of the talks with Twitter, Musk has additionally been searching for to order his rights to file a fraud go well with over his claims the platform’s executives misled him and different buyers concerning the variety of spam and robotic accounts amongst its greater than 230 million customers. 

Alex Spiro, an legal professional for Musk, mentioned in an announcement Twitter had supplied to take “billions” off its sale worth in alternate for “self-serving situations” that Musk refused. Twitter hasn’t replied to a request for touch upon Spiro’s assertion or the deal situations it’s searching for.

The case is Twitter v. Musk, 22-0613, Delaware Chancery Courtroom (Wilmington). 

Join the Fortune Options e-mail record so that you don’t miss our largest options, unique interviews, and investigations.