As Justin Fields led the Chicago Bears to an impressive victory over the Atlanta Falcons, the excitement among fans reached an exhilarating peak, with chants of “We want Justin” echoing throughout the stadium. This electric atmosphere was fueled by Fields’ remarkable performance, where he threw for over 260 yards and achieved a touchdown during a dominating win. His ability to make pivotal plays left the Chicago audience buzzing with anticipation and hope for his future as the team’s starting quarterback.
In recent discussions surrounding Fields’ future as the Chicago Bears’ quarterback, opinions have notably evolved from skepticism to cautious optimism. Over the last month, the prevailing sentiment has shifted from a definitive “no” to a more ambiguous “maybe.” According to ESPN insider Jeremy Fowler, Fields has significantly complicated Chicago’s upcoming draft decisions with his impressive performances this season. His ability to make critical plays has led many to reconsider the potential of drafting a new franchise quarterback.
Just a month ago, the idea of moving on from Fields was widely accepted as logical. However, since the beginning of December, he has led the Bears to victory in four out of five games, showcasing his best performance streak as their quarterback. This remarkable turnaround has prompted fans and analysts alike to reconsider the notion of trading away the first overall draft pick. Such a move would mean constructing a competitive roster around a quarterback who has yet to prove himself, echoing past mistakes made by franchises that overlooked game-changing quarterbacks in favor of less proven options.
During this five-game stretch, Fields has accounted for seven touchdowns—three through rushing and four through the air—while limiting himself to just three interceptions. Notably, two of these interceptions came during a challenging game against the Cleveland Browns’ fierce defense. While Bears fans have long endured a lack of consistent quarterback play, this recent surge in Fields’ performance has led to a glorified perception that may overshadow his ongoing struggles with decision-making. The Bears must carefully weigh whether they can afford to settle for a quarterback who has yet to reach his peak performance after three seasons.
When evaluating the potential benefits of retaining the first overall pick, the argument heavily favors keeping it. This decision is not solely about the allure of Caleb Williams, a quarterback prospect often compared to elite talents like Patrick Mahomes. However, it’s essential to acknowledge that no prospect is guaranteed success, and the recency bias influencing Chicago’s decision-making could lead to miscalculations.
Analyzing Fields’ current performance metrics reveals a mixed picture. Despite a month of relatively solid play, his fourth-quarter completion percentage ranks last in the NFL, while he stands twenty-fifth in yards per attempt, twenty-ninth in fourth-quarter interceptions, and thirtieth in QBR this season. These statistics illustrate the challenges he faces in high-pressure situations, raising questions about his long-term viability as the Bears’ quarterback.
The reality is that a change in coaching or offensive scheme is unlikely to transform Fields into a quarterback of the caliber of Josh Allen or Cam Newton. His playing style has more in common with a less effective version of Kyler Murray, marked by a tendency to be both turnover-prone and hesitant to make decisive throws. As per ESPN Stats & Info, Fields currently ranks last among qualified quarterbacks in average time per pass attempt (3.23 seconds) in both 2023 and throughout his career, indicating a concerning trend in his decision-making process.
The continued assessment of keeping the first overall pick remains critical. The relatively low salary of a first-round pick would allow the Bears to allocate significant funds towards acquiring free agents rather than committing a large contract to a quarterback with inconsistent performance. While NFL fans often focus on tangible attributes, it is vital to recognize that Fields has frequently struggled to elevate his game, leading to critical turnovers that have cost the team. If there were clear signs of growth and development, it would be easier to justify keeping him, but unfortunately, those signs have been elusive.
The Chicago Bears have recently endured a lengthy cycle with Jay Cutler, hoping he would eventually transition into elite status, only to witness him falter in comparison to other quarterbacks. Most teams do not have the luxury of resetting their roster after an underwhelming performance from a highly drafted quarterback. The Bears capitalized on the Panthers’ struggles this season, positioning themselves in a favorable position for a quarterback-rich draft class.
Now is not the time for complacency. While Fields is set to earn around $4 million next season, committing to him would essentially mean activating his $23 million fifth-year option by May 2024. Choosing to draft a quarterback like Williams would not only prevent a long-term financial commitment to Fields but also provide an opportunity to reset the franchise’s trajectory regarding quarterback salaries. A team without the first overall pick might find comfort in Fields developing into a middle-tier starter, but the Bears have a chance to make a more impactful decision.
Quarterbacks develop at different rates, but historical trends suggest that it is rare for a quarterback who has performed as poorly as Fields has to suddenly turn things around in their fourth or fifth year. By year three, Jalen Hurts was competing with Patrick Mahomes in a Super Bowl. While some quarterbacks, like Drew Brees, Alex Smith, Geno Smith, and Steve Young, have experienced late-career breakthroughs, these instances are exceptions rather than the rule.
Young and Brees both overcame rocky starts with struggling franchises, ultimately achieving Hall of Fame status, but such transformations took years to manifest. The 49ers also languished with Alex Smith until he finally began to resemble a competent starter in his seventh year, with his redemption arc unfolding during his ninth season on his fourth team.
Last year, Fields captured attention by achieving the third 1,000-yard rushing season by a quarterback in NFL history, but his passing game has been hindered by numerous factors, including his own performance. Over three seasons, Fields has demonstrated moments of brilliance but has largely disappointed, meeting the low expectations set by fans. While rookie quarterbacks like Williams or Drake Maye may struggle initially, it’s often more beneficial to allow a rookie to learn on the job than to watch a seasoned starter fail to capitalize on opportunities.
Fields now has one final opportunity to conclude his season positively against the Green Bay Packers, a matchup that holds immense significance for the Bears organization. In his five career games against the Packers, Fields has thrown nearly twice as many interceptions as touchdowns, resulting in losses in all five encounters. Unless the Bears are willing to endure further disappointment, it might be time to move on from Fields and allow him to explore his potential elsewhere. With hope, Fields will ultimately refine his skills, but time is running out for him in Chicago.
Follow DJ Dunson on X: @cerebralsportex
