A DOG proprietor divided opinion after utilizing a cheeky advert to try to get a free pet sitter.

The Sydney pooch proprietor got here up with an ingenious plan to get free doggy day care by providing up her four-legged companion as a “half time canine” for a household.

A member of the general public noticed the advert pinned to a noticeboard.

It featured two pictures of the little canine, Tedy, and an outline of his proprietor’s controversial proposal.

The advert, shared to Reddit, stated: “Do you like canines, however you’re too busy to have a full time dedication or an excessive amount of financially?

“Tedy is on the lookout for another household. Would you want or your children to have a canine?”

The canine’s “mum” stated she was completely happy to share him on the weekends and afternoons – however there was no point out of cost.

The sharing settlement appeared to rely upon whether or not the “different household” can be completely happy to take care of Tedy at no cost whereas she was away travelling.

The advert stated: “My mum is completely happy to share me with you on the weekend or afternoon (as per settlement) for an trade to take care of me when she is travelling.”

The weird providing divided opinion on-line – with many considering it was only a brazen try and get a free pet sitter.

The one who shared the advert on Reddit stated: “Do individuals do that or is that this particular person on the lookout for free canine sitting?”

One consumer replied: “It’s 100 per cent free babysitting.”

One other stated it “may be complicated” for the canine to have two house owners.

A 3rd stated: “Subsequent factor we all know individuals wish to provide an element time child.”

Whereas others admitted it was a bit “cheeky, they stated Tedy’s proprietor might be onto one thing.

One particular person wrote: “Jokes apart, that is certainly a really intelligent option to get free pet sitting, but in addition a win-win for some who would like to have a pet, however cant afford or simply haven’t got sufficient time.”

One other stated: “Sure they need free doggie daycare however hey if they will discover somebody who needs to try this then good luck to them.”

A 3rd wrote: “Pet sharing is certainly a factor, appears a bit cheeky to me however perhaps everybody advantages.”

Somebody thought it was a “truthful deal” so long as Tedy’s house owners pay for meals whereas they’re away.

“It’s free canine sitting however some individuals like having a short lived pet,” they stated.

It comes after a lady divided opinion after revealing how she will get her children to do home chores – and even makes them pay for snacks.

And one other girl sparked a livid debate after confessing that she needed to name in sick to work due to a foul break-up.