The governor calls the measure a “cynical scheme” by Lyft to fulfill a state mandate for ride-hailing corporations to transform most of their fleets to electrical autos by 2030.
The California Legislature lately handed a legislation requiring that 90% of a ride-hailing firm’s miles in California be lined by electrical autos by 2030. At present, the overwhelming majority of ride-hailing vehicles are owned or leased by people who contract with Lyft and Uber. The Sure on Proposition 30 marketing campaign needs state assist to fulfill that mandate.
Newsom is the face of the marketing campaign towards the proposition and is featured in an advert slamming Lyft.
“Prop. 30 has been marketed as a local weather initiative. However in actuality, it was devised by a single company to funnel state revenue taxes to profit their firm. Put merely, Prop. 30 is a Computer virus that places company welfare above the fiscal welfare of our complete state,” Newsom says within the advert, jabbing his finger towards the digital camera for emphasis.
The No on Proposition 30 marketing campaign is at a significant drawback, nevertheless. So far, opponents have raised simply over $15 million — a 3rd of what Lyft is spending to persuade voters to go the measure. However Newsom has excessive approval rankings and a whole lot of sway with voters. Netflix Chief Govt Reed Hastings and San Francisco enterprise capitalist Michael Moritz of Sequoia Capital are among the many “no” campaigns greatest donors, forking over $1 million apiece.
One of many main 30-second marketing campaign spots aired by supporters of Proposition 30 includes a firefighter who, with dramatic video of raging wildfires within the background, says California is in a disaster.
“We want extra firefighters and extra gear, higher forest administration, to stop wildfires and cut back poisonous smoke,” the firefighter tells viewers.
